The filming for Honey & Clover was concluded a pretty long while ago, before Sho changed his hairstyle. It was actually done for Beautiful Game, the stageplay he was in recently.
Oh, and that's not the character Sho's playing ^^; He plays Takemoto, not Mayama.
ah, that's what I thought but his hair looked so much like this guys I just HAD to ask. . I didn't think there's be so much hype over him playing a supporting character like that. . so he gets main role. . ^^. I guess..??
even mayama's hair is better than sho, imho ^^; and if u watched the whole anime, for a 'supporting character', mayama's storyline is quite solid..but my fav has to be takemoto and sho is playing him *sho looks really cute with takemoto's backpack ^^*
nup, haven't seen it all yet. . i'm about at ep 4. . ^^. And you've seen pics from filming or something??. . Is there like, a whole huge thing i'm missing here. . O_O.....
Either way, yeah. Mayama's hair is waay better than sho's. .you'd think he'd have at least a shorter haircut to play takemoto. .and as a side question, who's playing hagu. .O_o
go here (http://www.designchronicle.com/memento/archives/honey_and_clover/index.html) i love his anime blog, it has some news article about the movie, characters, cast, etc
Yeah, he plays the protaganist...not mayama...although when I first heard about it I thought that Sho would make a good Mayama...His hair is crazy because of Beautiful Game...and then he liked it so much, he decided to keep the curls...and now....*shakes head*
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 09:43 pm (UTC)Oh, and that's not the character Sho's playing ^^; He plays Takemoto, not Mayama.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-02 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-02 03:34 am (UTC)Either way, yeah. Mayama's hair is waay better than sho's. .you'd think he'd have at least a shorter haircut to play takemoto. .and as a side question, who's playing hagu. .O_o
no subject
Date: 2006-06-02 03:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-02 04:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-02 02:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-02 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-02 03:35 am (UTC)